Overview
“Rudolf Koch is one of the best lawyers in Delaware. He has incredible judgment, and is a master of both the courtroom and the boardroom” (The Legal 500). “His oral presentation and written advocacy skills are exceptional, and his knowledge of Delaware law is superb” (Chambers USA).
Litigating complex corporate and commercial disputes in Delaware’s state and federal courts, Rudy is “known by the courts as a real litigator” (The Legal 500) who is “wonderful on his feet” (Chambers USA). Rudy handles stockholder class actions, derivative lawsuits, contested mergers and acquisitions, contractual disputes, appraisal actions, and other statutory proceedings, such as books and records actions. “Tenacious, passionate and resourceful, he’s a gifted oral advocate who is super hardworking and very persuasive” (Chambers USA, 2024).
Rudy also advises general partners, corporate boards, and committees with respect to governance, litigation, internal investigations, and control disputes. He clerked for the Honorable Maryanne Trump Barry in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and practiced commercial litigation at Cravath, Swaine & Moore prior to joining the firm in 2006.
Rudy has been published in The Business Lawyer, The Review of Securities & Commodities Regulation, Insights: the Corporate and Securities Law Advisor, Business Law Today, and the Cornell Law Review. He has also lectured on corporate governance, class action litigation, and executive compensation.
PRACTICES
Arbitration & Mediation
Corporate & Chancery Litigation
Corporate Transactions
Corporate Governance
Mergers & Acquisitions
Commercial Litigation
Clerkships
- The Honorable Maryanne Trump Barry, United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Select Experience
- Successfully represented Jane Goldman through an expedited trial in a high-profile dispute relating to control of Sol Goldman’s multibillion-dollar New York real estate empire, where the court ruled in Jane’s favor that her nephew was not a member or manager of a Goldman family Delaware limited liability company
- Represents Telsa Inc. in further proceedings related to Mr. Musk’s rescinded pay package. Cross examined plaintiff’s expert, NYU law professor Jackson, at the hearing on plaintiff’s counsel’s unprecedented motion seeking over $7 billion worth of Tesla stock as an incentive fee and, at a subsequent hearing, argued the company’s position on the effectiveness and impact of the stockholder ratification vote on Mr. Musk’s compensation and the incentive fee request
- Successfully represented IDT Corporation, Howard Jonas, and the Patrick Henry Trust in the Delaware Court of Chancery, where after a 10-day trial the court rejected class action claims asserted by a former stockholder of Straight Path Communications Inc. seeking approximately $1.2 billion in damages
- Recognized as runner up for Litigator of the Week in American Lawyer for successfully co-leading a trial in the Court of Chancery on behalf of Silvio Scaglia over control of model and talent agency Elite World Group, where the court turned back a request by Julia Haart, star of the Netflix show My Unorthodox Life, to be reinstated as CEO and finding that she does not own or control half of the parent company, Freedom Holding, Inc.
- Successfully represented former Vice President of the United States, Al Gore, and his business partner through a private arbitration and also in litigation in the Delaware Court of Chancery in connection with their sale of Current TV
- Successfully defended Wayport, Inc. and its former general counsel through a trial in the Delaware Court of Chancery involving fiduciary duty and common law fraud claims arising out of a sale of common stock by a former officer to certain preferred investors
- Successfully represented a health-care services company in an appraisal proceeding where the court, after trial, found the appraised value to be approximately 15 percent less than the deal price
- Successfully represented an issuer in a declaratory judgment action through summary judgment and appeal, where the Delaware Supreme Court unanimously found that, absent a contrary contractual provision, an issuer can cancel notes for zero consideration under New York law
- Successfully represented Goldman Sachs defending against a derivative lawsuit challenging the company’s worldwide compensation structure
- Represented numerous private equity companies in connection with post-closing fraud, breaches of representations and warranties and earnout disputes
- Represented numerous boards, merger targets and acquirors in connection with injunction proceedings
- Represented numerous companies and directors in connection with corporate control disputes
- Defended directors and officers in numerous class action and derivative lawsuits
- Cornell Law School, J.D., magna cum laude
Cornell Law Review, Editor
Order of the Coif - Cornell University, B.S.
Education
Publications
Richards Layton and Cyrulnik Fattaruso Team Secures Post-Trial Entire Fairness Victory
October 3, 2023
WILMINGTON, Delaware (October 03, 2023) – Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. along with co-counsel Cyrulnik Fattaruso LLP achieved a significant victory in the Delaware Court of Chancery today for clients IDT Corporation, Howard Jonas, and the Patrick Henry Trust, with the Court rejecting class action claims asserted by a former stockholder of Straight Path Communications Inc. seeking…
Precluding Pre-Merger Communications in Post-Merger Dispute
The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation | June 12, 2019
In Shareholder Representative Services LLC v. RSI Holdco, LLC, C.A. No. 2018-0517-KSJM (Del. Ch. May 29, 2019), the Delaware Court of Chancery upheld a provision in a private-company merger agreement precluding a buyer from using the seller’s privileged emails against the seller in post-closing litigation. Following the guidance from the decision in Great Hill Equity Partners…
Delaware Insider: Executive Compensation Lessons from Freedman v. Adams
Business Law Today | March 2013
On January 14, 2013, in Freedman v. Adams, the Delaware Supreme Court reaffirmed that executive compensation decisions are business judgments vested in the board of directors that will rarely be second-guessed absent a showing that the board acted on an ill-informed basis or in bad faith.
Section 162(m) Litigation: What We Know So Far
The Review of Securities & Commodities Regulation | November 21, 2012
This article sets forth some typical allegations found in complaints challenging Section 162(m) plans, discusses the courts’ treatment of various arguments that have been raised in motions to dismiss, describes what typical settlements look like, and provides practical advice to mitigate the risk of becoming the target of one of these lawsuits.
Director Liability: From Van Gorkom to Southern Peru and Beyond
Insights | April 2012
The Delaware courts have, on a couple of occasions over the past few decades, held corporate directors liable in headline-grabbing fashion.
The Wheels Are Falling Off the Privilege Bus: What Deal Lawyers Need to Know to Avoid the Crash
The Business Lawyer | August 2011
Over the last several years, the rise of electronic discovery, the increasing focus of inhouse counsel on business roles, and the increasing complexity of mergers and acquisitions have expanded signifi cantly the volume and type of potentially privileged documents created in connection with mergers and acquisitions.
Deal Protection Devices Enforced in the Delaware Court of Chancery
Insights | March 2010
Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster’s recent decisions in Global Asset Capital, LLC v. Rubicon US REIT, Inc. and NACCO, Inc. v. Applica Incorporated provide good examples of Delaware’s approach to analyzing bargained-for deal protection devices.
Pro Bono Activities
- Child Attorney, Delaware’s Office of the Child Advocate
Recognition
- Chambers USA, since 2017
- The Legal 500, since 2016, Leading Lawyer, 2024, 2023, 2022
- Benchmark Litigation, since 2016
- The Best Lawyers in America, since 2017
- Super Lawyers, since 2013
- Delaware Today Top Lawyer, Appellate, 2024, 2021
Bar Admissions
- Delaware
- New York
- United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
- United States District Court, District of Delaware
- United States District Court, Southern District of New York
- United States District Court, Eastern District of New York